Which of the following best defines ‘ad nauseum’ in logical arguments?

The term 'ad nauseum' refers to arguments that rely on repetition to make a point or to persuade others. This concept is often invoked in discussions of logical reasoning to highlight situations where a statement or argument is repeated so frequently that it becomes tiresome or excessive, potentially leading people to accept it as true based solely on familiarity rather than sound reasoning or evidence.

In the context of logical arguments, relying on repetition can undermine the strength of the argument itself, as it may distract from critical analysis and validation of the points being made. Essentially, while reframing or reiterating a position can sometimes aid understanding, doing so to an excessive degree can serve to inflate the importance of the argument without providing additional substantive support. Therefore, this aspect of argumentation captures the essence of 'ad nauseum' accurately.